When I compare the best Torque Fitness strength equipment here, the key difference is how each option turns effort into training: the TANK M1 Push Sled adds variable resistance to loaded pushes, the Relentless Rope Trainer builds upper-body pulling endurance, and the Relentless Ripper Ski Machine pairs full-body work with measurable performance data. These are not interchangeable tools. Your choice depends on whether you want whole-body conditioning, a focused grip-and-shoulder challenge, or a machine you can track from session to session.
Get workout gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
I rank the M1 first for its broader movement range and use across different surfaces, while the Ripper is my strongest pick for structured, measurable workouts when a suitable mount and power outlet are available. The rope trainer takes less floor space but demands a rack or rig, and the adjustable Maverick club is the most flexible choice for rotational and single-arm strength work—provided you already own compatible Olympic plates. The main tradeoffs are mounting and storage needs, the kind of resistance each tool provides, and how much setup your training space can support.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- I rank the TANK M1 first for variable-resistance sled work, adaptable movement, and use on a range of surfaces, though its 67-pound weight complicates repositioning.
- The Relentless Ripper is the clearest pick for tracked, full-body ski-style conditioning, but it needs a compatible wall, rack, rig, or upright and corded power.
- The Relentless Rope Trainer fits rack- or rig-based rope work in a smaller footprint; its four resistance settings and bidirectional action distinguish it from the ski machine.
- The Maverick Torque Pro is the only adjustable-load club in this group and supports rotational strength training, but compatible 2-inch Olympic plates are required and not stated as included.
- I would choose by training pattern first: sled pushes for lower-body drive, rope or ski pulls for upper-body conditioning, and the club for loaded control and rotation.
| Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sled |  | Best Overall for Adaptable Sled Training | Operation: Manual | Resistance: Mag-Force variable resistance brake | Weight: 67 pounds | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Ripper Ski Machine |  | Best for Measurable Full-Body Conditioning | Resistance type: Progressive magnetic | Resistance levels: 10 | Mounting options: Wall, rack, rig, and compatible uprights | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Rope Trainer |  | Best Compact Rack-Mounted Pulling Trainer | Resistance type: Magnetic | Resistance levels: 4 | Resistance response: Increases with pulling speed and effort | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Dangerously Fit Maverick Torque Pro Adjustable Steel Club |  | Best Adjustable Club for Rotational Strength | Model: Maverick Torque Pro | Implement type: Adjustable steel club | Compatible plates: Standard 2-inch (51 mm) Olympic plates | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Torque Fitness strength equipment | Weight | Material | Resistance type | Resistance levels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sl | 67 pounds | Alloy steel | — | — |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Ripp | 50 pounds | — | Progressive magnetic | 10 |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Rope | 45 pounds | — | Magnetic | 4 |
| Dangerously Fit Maverick Torqu | — | Steel and rubber | — | — |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sled
The TANK M1 is my leading choice for buyers who want a single strength-conditioning tool that can support more than one kind of push. Its manual Mag-Force variable resistance responds without a corded power connection, and its all-surface design is intended to work across varied training areas. Compared with the Ripper and Rope Trainer, it does not need a wall, rack, or rig to anchor the workout. That makes it a more flexible starting point for a garage gym or outdoor training routine, assuming there is enough room to move it.
The M1’s appeal is practical rather than data-driven. The product details describe variable resistance but do not state a number of levels or explain the adjustment method, so I would not choose it if precise, repeatable settings are your main priority. The Ripper is stronger for workouts built around recorded metrics and defined resistance levels; the rope trainer offers a more focused pulling pattern. The sled instead suits buyers who want to push against resistance and vary the session through movement and effort.
Its removable handles help with storage and transport, but the sled still weighs 67 pounds. That is substantially more to manage than the 45-pound rope trainer, and it is not a lightweight accessory to carry between rooms. I would also distinguish this from a simple fixed-load sled: its magnetic brake is described as variable, but buyers should confirm how resistance is adjusted for their intended training. The ten-year frame and weld warranty is a useful point of reassurance; parts and workmanship are covered for one year.
For strength-focused conditioning that does not rely on a fixed installation, the M1 has the broadest fit in this group. I would skip it if your space cannot accommodate a moving sled, if you need a detailed workout display, or if frequent lifting and repositioning would be a problem.
Pros:- Manual Mag-Force resistance does not require corded power.
- Designed for use on a variety of surfaces.
- Removable handles make storage and transport easier.
- Long frame and weld warranty is specified.
Cons:- The 67-pound build can make moving or storing it difficult.
- The listing does not state resistance levels or explain adjustment details.
- Sled training requires room for movement and a suitable surface.
Best for: Garage-gym owners and personal trainers who want manual, variable-resistance sled work across different surfaces without a fixed rack mount.
Not ideal for: Buyers with limited room, anyone who needs clear resistance-level settings or workout metrics, and people who must regularly carry equipment weighing 67 pounds.
- Operation:Manual
- Resistance:Mag-Force variable resistance brake
- Weight:67 pounds
- Material:Alloy steel
- Handles:Removable
- Use:Designed for varied surfaces
- Frame and weld warranty:10 years
- Parts and workmanship warranty:1 year
Our verdict“I recommend the TANK M1 for versatile sled-based conditioning, provided its weight and space needs suit your training area.”
Torque Fitness Relentless Ripper Ski Machine
The Relentless Ripper is the most structured conditioning machine in this lineup. Its ten levels of progressive magnetic resistance let a buyer set the session more deliberately than the M1’s unspecified resistance adjustments, while the LED monitor records time, watts, calories, distance, and strokes per minute. That feedback makes it a better match for tracking intervals or comparing training sessions than the Rope Trainer, whose listed feature set centers on rope resistance and movement rather than a performance display.
Its ski-style action uses ergonomic grips for single- or double-pole movements, bringing both arms and the trunk into repeated work. This is distinct from the TANK M1’s moving push format and the Maverick club’s loaded rotational movements. If your goal is sustained pulling and full-body conditioning in a fixed training station, the Ripper is the clearest fit. Buyers who want lower-body-driven sled work or free-moving club exercises should look elsewhere.
The main cost of that structure is installation. The machine can mount to a wall, rack, rig, or compatible uprights, but it still needs an appropriate mounting point; it is not a freestanding option. Its corded electric power source also affects placement, so the intended location needs both a suitable mount and practical access to power. At 50 pounds, it is lighter than the M1 but still a substantial piece to install. The stated warranty coverage is differentiated: ten years on the frame, five on structural moving parts, and two on miscellaneous parts.
I rank it just below the sled because it is more dependent on a planned setup, not because it lacks useful training features. The monitor and resistance range are stronger for tracked workouts, but buyers should check mounting compatibility and power access before choosing it. It makes the most sense for someone who will use the fixed station consistently rather than someone seeking a movable, all-purpose strength tool.
Pros:- Ten magnetic resistance levels support varied workout intensity.
- Monitor tracks time, watts, calories, distance, and strokes per minute.
- Ergonomic grips accommodate single- and double-pole movements.
- Multiple mounting options can conserve floor space.
Cons:- Requires a compatible wall, rack, rig, or upright.
- Corded electric power can limit placement.
- At 50 pounds, installation and repositioning still require planning.
Best for: Buyers with a compatible wall, rack, rig, or upright who want structured ski-pull conditioning and a monitor for tracking workout output.
Not ideal for: People without a suitable mounting location or nearby power, and anyone seeking a freestanding sled or compact handheld strength implement.
- Resistance type:Progressive magnetic
- Resistance levels:10
- Mounting options:Wall, rack, rig, and compatible uprights
- Display:LED performance monitor
- Tracked metrics:Time, watts, calories, distance, strokes per minute
- Weight:50 pounds
- Dimensions:24.5 x 21 x 39.1 inches (D x W x H)
- Power:Corded electric
- Warranty:10 years frame; 5 years structural moving parts; 2 years miscellaneous parts
Our verdict“I would choose the Ripper for trackable, full-body ski conditioning when mounting compatibility and corded power are already accounted for.”
Torque Fitness Relentless Rope Trainer
The Relentless Rope Trainer is the focused upper-body option in this group. Its magnetic resistance rises as the user pulls faster or harder, giving the workout a different feel from the Ripper’s selectable ten-level ski-machine setup. There are four selectable resistance levels, and the rope moves in both directions, so sessions can include more than one pulling pattern without turning the unit into a general-purpose machine. Compared with the M1, it takes less floor area during use, but it trades the sled’s surface flexibility for a fixed rack or rig attachment.
The marine-grade, three-strand twisted rope and pivoting head are designed to support durable use and help keep the rope wrapped consistently. The pivoting head matters because it addresses rope tracking as the direction of movement changes. The Ripper is the better pick for shoppers who prioritize a performance monitor and recorded output; the Rope Trainer is the more direct choice for someone who wants manual, bidirectional rope work with resistance that responds to effort.
Its mounting limits are specific: it attaches to racks or rigs with tubing up to 6 by 6 inches, while a wall-mount bracket is sold separately. That means it may be convenient in an established rack setup but less straightforward for a buyer building a training space from scratch. At 45 pounds, it is the lightest of the listed Torque machines, yet that is still a substantial unit to handle when installing or repositioning it. The lever control and four settings provide a defined adjustment range, but they do not offer the Ripper’s ten levels or metric display.
I rank this behind the Ripper because its training feedback is less extensive and its mounting is narrower, though it may be the better fit when the aim is rope-specific pulling rather than ski-style conditioning. Skip it if you need a freestanding device, want to move equipment between locations often, or do not have compatible rack or rig tubing and do not want to source a separate wall bracket.
Pros:- Magnetic resistance increases with pulling speed and effort.
- Four selectable levels allow a defined resistance adjustment.
- Bidirectional movement supports rope work in both directions.
- Pivoting head is designed to help maintain rope wrap and reduce slippage.
Cons:- Wall-mount bracket is sold separately.
- Compatible rack or rig tubing must be 6 x 6 inches or smaller.
- Its 45-pound weight can make installation or repositioning awkward.
Best for: Rack- or rig-owning trainees who want bidirectional rope pulling with effort-responsive magnetic resistance and a compact fixed station.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a freestanding trainer, a workout monitor, broad resistance increments, or a wall mount included in the setup.
- Resistance type:Magnetic
- Resistance levels:4
- Resistance response:Increases with pulling speed and effort
- Movement:Bidirectional
- Rope:Marine-grade, three-strand twisted rope
- Compatible tubing:6 x 6 inches or smaller
- Weight:45 pounds
- Dimensions:17 x 10 x 16 inches (D x W x H)
- Mounting:Rack or rig; wall bracket sold separately
Our verdict“I recommend the Rope Trainer for focused, bidirectional rope work when compatible rack or rig mounting is already available.”
Dangerously Fit Maverick Torque Pro Adjustable Steel Club
The Maverick Torque Pro is the only free-weight-style implement in this group, so it serves a different strength goal from the three Torque machines. Its steel club takes standard 2-inch Olympic plates, letting the user change the load rather than relying on a machine’s fixed resistance system. A knurled handle, rubber-coated finish, and rubber sphere pommel are aimed at grip and control during club movements. That makes it a better fit for rotational and single-arm training than the Ripper’s repeated ski pulls or the M1’s loaded pushes.
Adjustable loading can suit different strength levels and training aims, but the supplied description does not say that Olympic plates are included. A buyer who does not already own compatible plates needs to account for that separately. The jaw lock collar is included for quick load changes; unlike the Ripper’s ten resistance levels or the Rope Trainer’s four settings, the club’s usable load depends on the plates available and the user’s ability to manage them. This is a strength implement, not a machine with a workout display or a self-contained resistance mechanism.
Compared with the rack-mounted Rope Trainer, the club does not require compatible tubing, and it avoids the M1’s large sled footprint. That freedom comes with a different demand: club exercises require the user to control a loaded implement through its path. I would favor it for someone seeking versatile grip, shoulder, and rotational work, but not as a direct replacement for full-body conditioning equipment. Its rubber coating may help protect steel and flooring, yet the listing does not provide a full item weight or a stated load range, so I would verify handling and plate compatibility before purchasing.
I place it fourth because its usefulness depends on a separate plate collection and a more specialized training style. For a buyer who owns Olympic plates and wants adjustable club work, that same dependency may be a benefit: one implement can accommodate changing loads without adding a dedicated resistance machine. If you want an all-in-one, ready-to-use conditioning station, the M1 or Ripper is a more direct fit.
Pros:- Adjustable loading works with standard 2-inch Olympic plates.
- Knurled handle and pommel support grip and control.
- Rubber-coated finish helps protect the steel and flooring.
- Jaw lock collar is included for load changes.
Cons:- Compatible Olympic plates are required and are not stated as included.
- The listing does not specify a full item weight or load range.
- Club work is more specialized than the sled and machine options.
Best for: Strength trainees who already own standard 2-inch Olympic plates and want adjustable-load club exercises for grip, shoulder, and rotational training.
Not ideal for: Buyers without compatible plates, people who want a monitor-equipped conditioning machine, or anyone uncomfortable controlling a loaded club through moving exercises.
- Model:Maverick Torque Pro
- Implement type:Adjustable steel club
- Compatible plates:Standard 2-inch (51 mm) Olympic plates
- Material:Steel and rubber
- Finish:Rubber-coated
- Handle:Knurled
- Included collar:Jaw lock collar
- Package dimensions:34.84 x 4.92 x 4.92 inches
- Package weight:3.24 kg
Our verdict“I would choose the Maverick Torque Pro for adjustable club training only if compatible Olympic plates and the required movement space are already available.”
How We Picked
I judged these four products by how directly they serve strength training, how much variety they offer, and how practical they are to fit into a home or training space. Because this lineup contains distinct tools rather than four versions of the same machine, I did not rank them on one narrow measure. I compared their training role, resistance approach, space and mounting demands, and setup requirements, then assigned each a role that reflects the buyer it serves best.
The TANK M1 earns the lead position because it supports varied pushing and conditioning work without needing a power source or fixed mount, and the listed all-surface design makes it more adaptable than the rack-mounted machines. Its weight and unspecified resistance adjustment details keep it from being an automatic choice for every garage gym. The Ripper ranks next for its ten magnetic resistance levels and performance monitor, which make its training feedback more explicit than the rope trainer’s. Its mounting and corded-power requirements are meaningful constraints.
I place the Relentless Rope Trainer third because its bidirectional operation and effort-responsive magnetic resistance offer a focused, compact way to train with a rope, though the setup depends on rack or rig tubing and a separate bracket for wall mounting. The Maverick club is last in overall breadth, not because it lacks utility, but because it is the most dependent on equipment the buyer may not have: compatible plates. It is a specialized strength tool rather than a general conditioning station. I used the supplied product details and specifications, and I do not treat the picks as personally tested equipment.
| Torque Fitness strength equipment | Material | Resistance type |
|---|---|---|
| Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sl | Alloy steel | — |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Ripp | — | Progressive magnetic |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Rope | — | Magnetic |
| Dangerously Fit Maverick Torqu | Steel and rubber | — |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Torque Fitness Strength Equipment
I would start with the movement you want to train, then check whether your room and existing equipment can support it. These four picks cover distinct jobs: pushing, ski-style pulling, rope work, and loaded club movements. Picking by brand alone misses the main decision.
Match the tool to your training goal
For loaded pushing and movement-based conditioning, I would look first at the TANK M1. Its manual resistance and all-surface design make it the broadest fit if you have room to move the sled. For a repeated pulling workout that involves both arms and the trunk, the Ripper Ski Machine has the clearest structure, with selectable resistance and a monitor that records several workout metrics. The Rope Trainer narrows the focus to bidirectional rope pulls, while the Maverick club is better suited to rotational, grip, and single-arm strength work.
These options should not be treated as direct substitutes. A sled push does not create the same movement pattern as a ski pull, and neither machine replicates the control required for club exercises. I would decide which training pattern you expect to use regularly before comparing individual specifications.
Check installation and room requirements
The M1 avoids a fixed mount, but it needs a usable travel path and enough room to store a 67-pound sled. The Ripper can mount to a wall, rack, rig, or compatible uprights, while its corded electric supply adds a second placement requirement. The Rope Trainer uses rack or rig tubing no larger than 6 x 6 inches; a wall bracket is sold separately. The Maverick club needs no machine mounting, though its loaded movements call for clear space around the user.
I would measure the intended installation area before ordering any mounted trainer. Check the exact rack or rig dimensions, the mounting surface, and practical access to power for the Ripper. For the sled, think about both the workout lane and where the unit will live between sessions. A product that fits on paper may still be inconvenient if the setup interferes with other equipment.
Compare resistance and workout feedback
The Ripper offers the most explicit resistance range in the lineup with ten magnetic levels, and its monitor tracks time, watts, calories, distance, and strokes per minute. The Rope Trainer lists four selectable levels and a resistance response that increases with pulling speed and effort. The M1 uses a variable-resistance magnetic brake, but the available details do not state level count or adjustment steps. The Maverick changes load through compatible Olympic plates rather than a built-in brake.
If recorded metrics matter, I would favor the Ripper. If you prefer resistance tied to effort during rope work, the Rope Trainer offers that distinction. If you want to vary a sled session through movement and exertion, the M1 may suit you, but check adjustment details with the seller if specific repeatable settings matter. For the club, confirm plate availability and the load you can handle safely.
Account for setup, handling, and included parts
The listed machine weights are 67 pounds for the M1, 50 pounds for the Ripper, and 45 pounds for the Rope Trainer. Those figures matter during installation and storage, especially for mounted units. Removable M1 handles help with storage and transport, but do not make the sled light. The Maverick package weight is listed as 3.24 kg, but that should not be mistaken for a stated full loaded weight; plates are needed and are not identified as included.
I would also separate what is included from what is required. The Rope Trainer’s wall bracket is sold separately, while the Maverick includes a jaw lock collar but requires compatible plates. The Ripper needs a mount and corded power access. Checking these details before buying helps avoid choosing a tool that arrives without a necessary part of the planned setup.
Choose for repeat use, not maximum feature count
The right pick is the one that fits the workouts you will repeat and the space you can maintain. I would choose the M1 for adaptable sled sessions, the Ripper for measured ski-style conditioning, the Rope Trainer for mounted rope work, and the Maverick for adjustable club training with plates already on hand. More resistance settings or a larger collection of workout metrics do not help if the movement itself does not match your routine.
Think about who will use the equipment, how often it needs to be moved, and whether you want a machine station or a free-moving implement. For shared spaces, the M1’s travel path and the mounted machines’ installation requirements deserve particular attention. For an existing plate-and-rack gym, the Rope Trainer and Maverick may fit more naturally than they would in an unbuilt room.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which pick is the most versatile for a garage gym?
I would choose the TANK M1 if versatility means manual sled work across varied surfaces without a fixed machine mount. It is still a specialized sled, not an all-purpose strength station, and it needs room to travel and store. If your idea of versatility means several measurable resistance settings, the Ripper is more structured, but it requires mounting and corded power.
Which option is best for tracking workouts?
The Relentless Ripper Ski Machine is the clear choice for workout feedback in this group. Its LED monitor tracks time, watts, calories, distance, and strokes per minute, and its ten resistance levels make session setup more explicit than the Rope Trainer’s four settings. The other picks have no listed performance monitor.
Can the Relentless Rope Trainer be wall-mounted?
It can be wall-mounted with a bracket, but the product details state that the wall-mount bracket is sold separately. Its listed standard mounting is to a rack or rig with tubing up to 6 x 6 inches. I would confirm that the mounting hardware and the intended structure match your installation before buying.
Does the Maverick Torque Pro include Olympic weight plates?
The supplied product details list a jaw lock collar as included and specify compatibility with standard 2-inch Olympic plates, but they do not state that plates are included. I would plan on needing compatible plates unless the seller confirms otherwise. This makes the club a more straightforward fit for buyers who already own a plate collection.
Which equipment should I skip if I have limited space?
I would first assess the TANK M1, because it needs room for sled movement as well as storage, even though its handles are removable. The Ripper and Rope Trainer can conserve floor area through mounting, but they still need compatible structures and installation clearance. The Maverick occupies less space between sessions, but its loaded movement also requires room around the user.
Conclusion
I would choose the TANK M1 if my priority were adaptable sled-based conditioning and I had space to move and store a 67-pound unit. For measurable, full-body ski-style work, I would pick the Relentless Ripper, provided a compatible mount and corded power are practical. The Relentless Rope Trainer is the better match for rack or rig owners who want focused bidirectional rope pulls, while the Maverick Torque Pro suits trainees who already own Olympic plates and want rotational club work.
My ranking favors the M1 for its broader setup flexibility, then the Ripper for its defined resistance and workout data, followed by the rope trainer’s more specialized mounted action and the plate-dependent club. I would change that order for a buyer whose training goal is already clear: choose the tool that matches the movement you plan to repeat, then confirm its mounting, space, power, and included-equipment requirements.
